Skip to content

Microsoft expands AI visibility and Performance Max tools: what local advertisers should check

Victorian advertising analyst comparing brass AI visibility gauges and campaign experiments in a whimsical steampunk workshop

Microsoft Advertising has expanded several of the tools around its automated campaigns. The August update brings topic-level reporting to Microsoft Clarity’s AI Visibility feature, two ways to test Performance Max, and Performance Max support in Ad Preview Hub.

None of those changes should prompt a local business to rebuild its advertising overnight. Together, though, they offer something useful: better ways to see what automated systems associate with your business, test whether automation is adding value, and check creative before it goes live.

What Microsoft has changed

The first change is Topic Insights in Microsoft Clarity’s AI Visibility reporting. It groups citations by subject, so a business can see which topics AI systems connect with its website and where coverage may be thin. The reporting includes grounding queries — the searches an AI system makes while forming an answer — alongside citation share and share of authority.

This is not a perfect scorecard for sales or leads. A citation does not automatically mean a valuable visit, and a high visibility figure is not a business result on its own. It can, however, reveal whether AI tools understand the themes a website is meant to be known for.

For a Bath hotel, that might mean checking whether the site is associated with useful subjects such as accessible stays, conferences or family breaks rather than only its brand name. For a Somerset manufacturer, it might show whether specialist services and sectors appear clearly enough. The sensible use is diagnostic: compare the topics with the services customers actually buy, then investigate important gaps.

That fits with the broader work of improving visibility in AI-driven search. Clear service pages, credible evidence and consistent language still matter more than chasing a new dashboard metric.

Performance Max can now be tested more deliberately

Microsoft has also highlighted two experiment types for Performance Max campaigns. Uplift experiments are designed to measure what happens when Performance Max is added alongside existing activity. Upgrade experiments compare existing Search or Shopping campaigns with Performance Max after migration.

This distinction matters. Automated campaigns can report conversions while still leaving a difficult question unanswered: did they create additional business, or did they simply take credit for demand that another campaign would have captured?

A controlled experiment is a better way to approach that question than switching everything at once. Microsoft recommends having at least 30 conversions in the previous 30 days, keeping targets, product groups and other settings consistent between test and control groups, and allowing four to twelve weeks before judging the result.

Those requirements also set a useful boundary. Many smaller local advertisers will not have enough monthly conversions to produce a reliable test. If that is your situation, do not manufacture certainty from a tiny sample. Keep changes limited, review lead quality as well as volume, and allow for the delay between an enquiry and a confirmed sale.

Businesses already investing in paid and organic search marketing should also consider whether Microsoft Ads has a distinct role in the mix. The right comparison is not simply Microsoft versus Google. It is whether each channel reaches useful customers at an acceptable cost without duplicating activity unnecessarily.

Creative previews should make approval easier

Ad Preview Hub previously supported Microsoft Audience ads. It now supports Performance Max and includes previews of Bing search results pages. Teams can create shareable preview links before a campaign launches.

That sounds like a modest workflow change, but it could prevent avoidable mistakes. Performance Max assembles assets across several placements, which makes it harder to picture every possible combination from a list of headlines, descriptions and images. A preview gives a business owner, marketing team or compliance reviewer a better chance to spot awkward cropping, inconsistent messages or an offer that lacks context.

A preview is still not a guarantee of every live combination. It should be treated as a quality-control step, not a complete substitute for checking the campaign after launch.

What Bath and South West advertisers should check now

If you use Microsoft Advertising or Clarity, there are four practical checks worth making:

  • Review the topics associated with your site and compare them with your priority services, locations and customer questions.
  • Do not turn citation share into a headline business target; connect any visibility work to qualified visits, enquiries and revenue.
  • Use a Performance Max experiment only when conversion volume and tracking quality are sufficient to support a fair comparison.
  • Share campaign previews with the people responsible for brand, accuracy and compliance before approving creative.

The common thread is measurement before commitment. Microsoft is adding more automation, but it is also giving advertisers more ways to inspect and test it. For local organisations with limited budgets, that second part is the useful one: define what success means, change one thing at a time, and keep human judgement involved.

Source: Search Engine Journal’s report on Microsoft Advertising’s August product update.